Comments on: Too many inches http://178.63.27.54:8080/statictangents/2018/01/21/too-many-inches/ Random tangents Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:22:15 +0000 hourly 1 By: Mark Dennehy http://178.63.27.54:8080/statictangents/2018/01/21/too-many-inches/comment-page-1/#comment-420463 Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:22:15 +0000 http://178.63.27.54:8080/statictangents/?p=4857#comment-420463 It’s not a plane shaving from shoulder to shoulder Matt; as someone pointed out on his blog, Peter Follansbee has found similar joints in 17th century stuff and the difference there is quite substantial:
https://pfollansbee.wordpress.com/2016/10/14/shelburne-museum-square-table/

The planing out of square for the table leg is the bit that’s a plane shaving or two out (more than that and you’d have too much torsion to assemble the table readily I think).

]]>
By: Matt McGrane http://178.63.27.54:8080/statictangents/2018/01/21/too-many-inches/comment-page-1/#comment-420359 Sun, 21 Jan 2018 21:47:19 +0000 http://178.63.27.54:8080/statictangents/?p=4857#comment-420359 “That iron can really get some distance on it when you give it a belt with a hammer when the wedge isn’t holding it in the plane.” That one gave me a good laugh.

Regarding the part at the beginning about cutting the inside shoulder of the tenon a bit deeper than the outside shoulder – I’ve seen Richard McGuire’s latest series too, but I thought it was only a plane shaving or two difference from shoulder to shoulder. Or maybe I’m confusing that with the way he planes the legs slightly out-of-square.

]]>
By: ralph boumenot http://178.63.27.54:8080/statictangents/2018/01/21/too-many-inches/comment-page-1/#comment-420304 Sun, 21 Jan 2018 10:32:57 +0000 http://178.63.27.54:8080/statictangents/?p=4857#comment-420304 I like your shooting board solution for the molding plane.

]]>